Part 3
The Chart Zone
Everything, for the reader who wants to compare all 29 schools. This part is reference, so it’s dense on purpose. Skim it, scan it, or come back when you need to look something up.
Find your answer fast
| Your question | Go to | Start with |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Is the MBA still worth it? | Jobs and pay, then What it costs | Jobs 3, Jobs 9 and Cost 2 |
| 2. Which programs fit my goals? | Industries, Functions, and Employers and reachability | Industry 4, Function 4 and Employer 8 |
| 3. Will robots eat the MBA jobs? | AI and these jobs | AI 1 and AI 3 |
| 4. Can I build a U.S. career on a visa? | Visas | Visa 1 and Visa 3 |
| 5. Is it harder to get in? | Getting in | Admissions 2 and Admissions 5 |
| What about my school? | School pages | Your school’s page |
The sections
How to read the Chart Zone
Every number here was read from a school’s own employment report, class profile, website or press release. The point of putting 29 schools on one grid is that you can finally compare them, differences and all. Unless a source note says otherwise, a chart shows the Class of 2025.
Two rules for reading it. A blank cell means the school didn’t publish the number, and blank never means zero. And percentages are a share of the people who were looking for a job or who accepted one (the standard these schools follow), so each school is counting a slightly different slice of its class. Where a school left a gap we could reasonably fill, we filled it and said so.
A few more things that hold everywhere. “Class of 2025” means the people who graduated in 2025. Placement rates are a share of the graduates who were looking for a job, so founders and people going back to a sponsor are left out. Top 10 schools are in bold wherever we rank them. And Columbia, UNC, USC and Georgetown don’t publish every head count, so a few of their numbers are our estimates, marked where they appear.
Who’s included and why (our 30 schools and why it’s 29 this year):
Years ago, we picked our list off a Poets&Quants ranking that we largely agreed with at the time. We just took that rank order (including who is top 10 and who is top 30) and stuck with it ever since, even as individual schools have bounced in and out of the top 30 according to whichever ranking agency you ask this week.
UF Warrington has been on that list since the beginning for the same reason. This year, we're taking it off. Not because the program changed, but because we could not find usable employment data for the Class of 2025 anywhere. No employment report, no class profile with placement numbers, nothing we could stand behind.
If there are any artifacts in chart names that say 30, this is why. This year, it’s 29.
Some schools just aren’t that transparent about their data
Kiarash, Claude, and I scoured the internet for this data. We even used the Wayback Machine for some of it. When a value is zero, that means it’s not out there. AKA, schools didn’t publish it or there is no digital record of it to be found today.
For example, we did deep analysis on specific employers at each school. Stanford and Arizona State don’t publish actual employer company names, and Georgia Tech doesn’t publish a list tied to a specific class. Why? We don’t know. But the absence of that information means we can’t compare them fairly in a company-by-company analysis (the Employers and Visas sections of the Chart Zone), so we excluded all three from that particular analysis.
So keep this in mind as you read this report. Where there is no info, there is no info. And that in itself is info.